Costa Rica vs Malaysia: Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
134,733 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
158,869 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
66th
Malaysia rank
63rd

Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Malaysia
050.0k100.0k150.0k197419982023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 158,869 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 134,733 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 24,136 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 66th and Malaysia ranks 63rd of 198 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Malaysia Difference Ahead
1970s 4,534 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,583 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 48.82 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 6,178 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,381 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,204 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 17,002 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 36,422 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 19,420 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 29,188 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 66,556 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 37,367 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 59,027 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 126,576 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 67,549 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 100,191 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 127,760 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 27,568 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher service imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 158,869 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 134,733 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in service imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Malaysia?
24,136 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Malaysia?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Malaysia rank globally for service imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 66th and Malaysia ranks 63rd of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Malaysia: Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/service-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/service-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/malaysia/">Costa Rica vs Malaysia: Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,360 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Service imports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.