Costa Rica vs El Salvador: Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
134,733 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
141,334 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
66th
El Salvador rank
65th

Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • El Salvador
050.0k100.0k150.0k197619992023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 141,334 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 134,733 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 6,601 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 47 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 66th and El Salvador ranks 65th of 198 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica El Salvador Difference Ahead
1970s 4,534 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,325 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,791 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 6,178 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,820 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,643 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 17,002 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 24,558 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,556 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 29,188 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 53,689 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 24,501 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 59,027 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 75,263 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 16,237 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 100,191 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 114,610 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 14,419 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher service imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 141,334 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 134,733 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in service imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and El Salvador?
6,601 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and El Salvador?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and El Salvador rank globally for service imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 66th and El Salvador ranks 65th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs El Salvador: Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/service-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/service-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/el-salvador/">Costa Rica vs El Salvador: Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,360 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Service imports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.