Central Europe and the Baltics vs Luxembourg: Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
201,737 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Luxembourg
50.44 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
4th
Luxembourg rank
5th

Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Luxembourg
020.0M40.0M60.0M199220072023

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 50.44 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 201,737 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 50.24 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 250.0 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 4th and Luxembourg ranks 5th of 47 groups.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 58,625 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10.19 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10.13 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg
2010s 112,257 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 26.44 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 26.32 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg
2020s 164,734 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 46.04 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 45.87 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher service imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 50.44 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 201,737 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in service imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Luxembourg?
50.24 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Luxembourg?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Luxembourg rank globally for service imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 4th and Luxembourg ranks 5th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Luxembourg: Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/service-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/service-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/luxembourg/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Luxembourg: Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,360 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Service imports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.