Bangladesh vs Cape Verde: Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
72,107 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde
69,060 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
90th
Cape Verde rank
92nd

Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Cape Verde
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k197619992023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 72,107 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 69,060 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 3,047 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 90th and Cape Verde ranks 92nd of 198 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Cape Verde in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Cape Verde Difference Ahead
1970s 2,075 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,138 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 937.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 3,904 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,781 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 122.77 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 8,297 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,933 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,635 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 17,978 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 55,555 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 37,577 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 55,906 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 83,717 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 27,811 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 76,196 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 60,387 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 15,808 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher service imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Cape Verde?
Bangladesh, at 72,107 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 69,060 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in service imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Cape Verde?
3,047 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cape Verde?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Cape Verde rank globally for service imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 90th and Cape Verde ranks 92nd of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Cape Verde: Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/service-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/service-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/cabo-verde/">Bangladesh vs Cape Verde: Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Service imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,360 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Service imports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.