Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Service exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
12,182 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
864,236 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2018
Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
32nd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
35th

Service exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k197720002023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 864,236 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 12,182 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 852,054 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 70.9 times Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 32nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 35th of 45 groups.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher service exports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 864,236 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 12,182 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2018.
What is the difference in service exports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) and Turks and Caicos Islands?
852,054 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) and Turks and Caicos Islands?
5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2018.
How do Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for service exports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 32nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 35th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Service exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Service exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/service-exports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-ida-and-ibrd-countries/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/service-exports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-ida-and-ibrd-countries/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Service exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Service exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Service exports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.