Central Europe and the Baltics vs Luxembourg: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per unit of GDP

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.018 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Luxembourg
0.164 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
31st
Luxembourg rank
31st

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Luxembourg
00.050.10.150.2199320092025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 0.164 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.018 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 0.146 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 9.1 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 31st and Luxembourg ranks 31st of 47 groups.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0197 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1042 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0845 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP Luxembourg
2000s 0.024 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1631 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1392 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP Luxembourg
2010s 0.0236 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1569 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1333 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP Luxembourg
2020s 0.0206 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1637 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1431 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per unit of gdp, Central Europe and the Baltics or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 0.164 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.018 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per unit of gdp between Central Europe and the Baltics and Luxembourg?
0.146 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Luxembourg?
27 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2025.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Luxembourg rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 31st and Luxembourg ranks 31st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Luxembourg: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/luxembourg/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Luxembourg: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,154 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.