OECD members vs Switzerland: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

OECD members
23,933 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Switzerland
1.74 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
9th
Switzerland rank
9th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • OECD members
  • Switzerland
0500.0k1.0M1.5M197720002023

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 1.74 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 23,933 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 1.72 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Switzerland's figure about 72.7 times OECD members's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 9th and Switzerland ranks 9th of 47 groups.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Switzerland Difference Ahead
1980s 1,808 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 35,176 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 33,368 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Switzerland
1990s 4,112 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 83,626 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 79,514 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Switzerland
2000s 9,216 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 510,863 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 501,647 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Switzerland
2010s 15,200 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.04 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.02 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Switzerland
2020s 21,761 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.49 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.47 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, OECD members or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 1.74 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 23,933 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between OECD members and Switzerland?
1.72 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Switzerland?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do OECD members and Switzerland rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
OECD members ranks 9th and Switzerland ranks 9th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Switzerland: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/switzerland/">OECD members vs Switzerland: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.