OECD members vs San Marino: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

OECD members
23,933 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
San Marino
1.08 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
9th
San Marino rank
11th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • OECD members
  • San Marino
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M198220022023

How they compare

San Marino currently reports 1.08 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 23,933 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 1.05 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes San Marino's figure about 45.0 times OECD members's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 9th and San Marino ranks 11th of 47 groups.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members San Marino Difference Ahead
2010s 17,570 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 675,532 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 657,962 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre San Marino
2020s 21,761 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 958,016 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 936,255 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre San Marino

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, OECD members or San Marino?
San Marino, at 1.08 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 23,933 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between OECD members and San Marino?
1.05 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with San Marino ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and San Marino?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do OECD members and San Marino rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
OECD members ranks 9th and San Marino ranks 11th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs San Marino: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/san-marino/">OECD members vs San Marino: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.