Mexico vs Pakistan: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Mexico
33,069 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
36,775 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
93rd
Pakistan rank
90th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mexico
  • Pakistan
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197619992023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 36,775 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 33,069 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 3,706 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 93rd and Pakistan ranks 90th of 197 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 132.21 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,279 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,147 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 822.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,848 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,026 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 2,250 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,917 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,667 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 9,579 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,088 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,509 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 14,440 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 27,088 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,648 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 28,372 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 39,610 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,238 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Mexico or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 36,775 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 33,069 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Mexico and Pakistan?
3,706 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Pakistan?
45 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Pakistan rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Mexico ranks 93rd and Pakistan ranks 90th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Pakistan: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/pakistan/">Mexico vs Pakistan: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.