Malta vs OECD members: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Malta
3.86 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
23,933 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
6th
OECD members rank
9th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • OECD members
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M197119972023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 3.86 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 23,933 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 3.84 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 161.4 times OECD members's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 6th and OECD members ranks 9th of 197 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta OECD members Difference Ahead
1980s 281,338 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,808 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 279,530 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 298,737 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,112 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 294,625 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 1.92 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,216 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.91 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 4.15 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 15,200 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4.14 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 4.67 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 21,761 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4.65 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or OECD members?
Malta, at 3.86 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 23,933 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and OECD members?
3.84 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and OECD members?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Malta and OECD members rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 6th and OECD members ranks 9th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs OECD members: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/oecd-members/">Malta vs OECD members: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.