Late-demographic dividend vs Mauritius: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Late-demographic dividend
5,152 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
158,953 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Late-demographic dividend rank
36th
Mauritius rank
36th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Mauritius
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197619992023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 158,953 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 5,152 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 153,801 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 30.9 times Late-demographic dividend's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 36th and Mauritius ranks 36th of 47 groups.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 508 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 86,104 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 85,596 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 2,053 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 113,457 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 111,404 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 3,828 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 172,148 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 168,320 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 4,700 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 161,924 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 157,224 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Late-demographic dividend or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 158,953 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 5,152 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Late-demographic dividend and Mauritius?
153,801 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Mauritius?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Mauritius rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 36th and Mauritius ranks 36th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Mauritius: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/late-demographic-dividend/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/late-demographic-dividend/mauritius/">Late-demographic dividend vs Mauritius: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.