Kazakhstan vs Papua New Guinea: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Kazakhstan
996.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
748.57 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
180th
Papua New Guinea rank
181st

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Papua New Guinea
05001.0k1.5k197619992023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 996.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 748.57 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 248.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.3 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 180th and Papua New Guinea ranks 181st of 197 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 43.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 234.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 191.39 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2000s 234.74 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 81.48 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 153.26 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 909.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 548.5 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 360.53 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 907.86 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 896.39 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11.48 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Papua New Guinea?
Kazakhstan, at 996.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 748.57 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea?
248.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 180th and Papua New Guinea ranks 181st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Papua New Guinea: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/papua-new-guinea/">Kazakhstan vs Papua New Guinea: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.