Jamaica vs Maldives: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Jamaica
340,416 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives
323,860 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
23rd
Maldives rank
25th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • Maldives
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k197619992023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 340,416 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 323,860 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 16,556 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 23rd and Maldives ranks 25th of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 3 and Maldives in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Maldives Difference Ahead
1970s 10,412 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,444 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,968 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 25,553 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 26,467 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 913.55 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 50,666 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 62,352 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,686 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 164,672 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 155,016 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,657 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 230,824 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 126,921 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 103,903 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 333,632 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 343,356 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,724 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Jamaica or Maldives?
Jamaica, at 340,416 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 323,860 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Jamaica and Maldives?
16,556 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Maldives?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Maldives rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 23rd and Maldives ranks 25th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Maldives: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/maldives/">Jamaica vs Maldives: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.