Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Indonesia
8,065 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
8,523 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
136th
Zimbabwe rank
133rd

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Indonesia
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197720002023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 8,523 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 8,065 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Indonesia, a difference of 458 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Indonesia ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 197 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 114.2 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 431.16 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 316.96 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 265.74 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 559.24 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 293.5 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 3,857 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,111 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 745.87 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 5,124 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,570 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 554.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 6,699 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,964 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 265.06 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Indonesia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 8,523 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 8,065 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
458 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
29 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Zimbabwe rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Indonesia ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/zimbabwe/">Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.