Europe & Central Asia vs Hong Kong: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Europe & Central Asia
21,367 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong
2.16 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
10th
Hong Kong rank
8th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Hong Kong
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M199820102023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 2.16 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 21,367 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 2.13 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 100.9 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 10th and Hong Kong ranks 8th of 47 groups.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1990s 4,401 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 589,608 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 585,206 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 8,516 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 666,298 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 657,781 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 13,625 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.15 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.13 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 19,195 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.98 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.96 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Europe & Central Asia or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 2.16 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 21,367 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Europe & Central Asia and Hong Kong?
2.13 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Hong Kong?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Hong Kong rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 10th and Hong Kong ranks 8th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Hong Kong: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Europe & Central Asia vs Hong Kong: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.