Egypt vs Lesotho: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Egypt
20,078 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
19,082 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
112th
Lesotho rank
114th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Egypt
  • Lesotho
010.0k20.0k30.0k197519992023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 20,078 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 19,082 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 996 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Lesotho ahead.

Egypt ranks 112th and Lesotho ranks 114th of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Lesotho Difference Ahead
1970s 1,702 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,825 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 123.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 3,714 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,390 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,677 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 5,243 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,004 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,761 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 5,958 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 14,361 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,403 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 21,863 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 20,699 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,164 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 27,822 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 17,898 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,924 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Egypt or Lesotho?
Egypt, at 20,078 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 19,082 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Egypt and Lesotho?
996 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Lesotho?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Lesotho rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Egypt ranks 112th and Lesotho ranks 114th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Lesotho: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/lesotho/">Egypt vs Lesotho: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.