Ecuador vs Norway: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
23,894 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
25,132 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
104th
Norway rank
101st

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Norway
010.0k20.0k30.0k197519992023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 25,132 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 23,894 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 1,238 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Norway ahead.

Ecuador ranks 104th and Norway ranks 101st of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 132.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 181.51 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 48.85 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 233.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 293.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 60 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 1,918 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,353 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,435 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 9,927 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,141 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,786 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 12,229 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,543 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 314.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 19,986 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 20,673 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 687.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Norway?
Norway, at 25,132 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 23,894 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Norway?
1,238 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Norway?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Norway rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 104th and Norway ranks 101st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Norway: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/norway/">Ecuador vs Norway: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.