Ecuador vs Malaysia: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
23,894 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
22,288 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
104th
Malaysia rank
106th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Malaysia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k197419982023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 23,894 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 22,288 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 1,606 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Malaysia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 104th and Malaysia ranks 106th of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Malaysia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Malaysia Difference Ahead
1970s 132.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 212.69 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 80.03 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 233.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 392.46 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 159.37 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 1,918 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,698 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 220.26 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 9,927 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,641 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,287 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 12,229 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,718 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,511 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 19,986 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 18,216 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,769 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Malaysia?
Ecuador, at 23,894 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 22,288 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Malaysia?
1,606 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 104th and Malaysia ranks 106th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Malaysia: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malaysia/">Ecuador vs Malaysia: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.