Denmark vs Mauritius: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
159,309 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
158,953 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
35th
Mauritius rank
36th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Mauritius
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197519992023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 159,309 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 158,953 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 356 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 35th and Mauritius ranks 36th of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 24,956 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,005 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 16,951 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 28,003 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 25,222 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,782 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 68,055 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 72,991 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,936 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 81,565 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 113,457 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 31,892 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 86,979 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 172,148 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 85,169 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 125,303 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 161,924 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 36,621 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or Mauritius?
Denmark, at 159,309 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 158,953 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and Mauritius?
356 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Mauritius?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Mauritius rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 35th and Mauritius ranks 36th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Mauritius: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/mauritius/">Denmark vs Mauritius: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.