Denmark vs IDA & IBRD total: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
159,309 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA & IBRD total
7,848 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
35th
IDA & IBRD total rank
32nd

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • IDA & IBRD total
050.0k100.0k150.0k197519992023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 159,309 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 7,848 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 151,461 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 20.3 times IDA & IBRD total's.

Across all 40 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 35th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 32nd of 197 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark IDA & IBRD total Difference Ahead
1980s 33,553 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 501.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 33,052 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 68,055 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 798.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 67,257 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 81,565 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,535 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 79,030 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 86,979 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,273 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 81,706 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 125,303 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,168 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 118,135 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or IDA & IBRD total?
Denmark, at 159,309 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 7,848 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and IDA & IBRD total?
151,461 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and IDA & IBRD total?
40 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2023.
How do Denmark and IDA & IBRD total rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 35th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 32nd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs IDA & IBRD total: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ida-and-ibrd-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ida-and-ibrd-total/">Denmark vs IDA & IBRD total: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.