Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
22,152 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
23,894 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
107th
Ecuador rank
104th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Ecuador
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k197619992023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 23,894 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 22,152 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 1,742 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 107th and Ecuador ranks 104th of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 5 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 551.64 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 141.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 410.52 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 1,453 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 233.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,220 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 3,272 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,918 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,354 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 9,684 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,927 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 242.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 17,471 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,229 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,242 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 20,154 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 19,986 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 168.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 23,894 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 22,152 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Ecuador?
1,742 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ecuador?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Ecuador rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 107th and Ecuador ranks 104th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/ecuador/">Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.