Chile vs Zimbabwe: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
8,138 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
8,523 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
135th
Zimbabwe rank
133rd

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197519992023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 8,523 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 8,138 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 385 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 166.32 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 77.74 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 88.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 266.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 415.17 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 148.53 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 639.11 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 559.24 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 79.87 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 3,108 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,111 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 5,633 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,570 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,063 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 6,954 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,964 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10.59 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 8,523 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 8,138 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Zimbabwe?
385 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
33 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zimbabwe: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/zimbabwe/">Chile vs Zimbabwe: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.