Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
41,648 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
3.86 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
5th
Malta rank
6th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Malta
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M197119972023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 3.86 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 41,648 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 3.82 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 92.7 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Malta ranks 6th of 47 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 7,272 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 279,528 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 272,257 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 19,730 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.92 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.90 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 30,730 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4.15 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4.12 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 37,980 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4.67 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4.64 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Malta?
Malta, at 3.86 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 41,648 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta?
3.82 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Malta ranks 6th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/malta/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.