Cayman Islands vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Cayman Islands
26.14 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics
41,648 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cayman Islands rank
2nd
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
5th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Central Europe and the Baltics
010.0M20.0M30.0M199320082023

How they compare

Cayman Islands currently reports 26.14 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 41,648 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 26.10 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cayman Islands's figure about 627.7 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Cayman Islands has been ahead every year.

Cayman Islands ranks 2nd and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th of 197 countries.

Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Central Europe and the Baltics Difference Ahead
2010s 6.09 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 29,742 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6.06 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cayman Islands
2020s 16.80 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 37,980 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 16.76 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cayman Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Cayman Islands or Central Europe and the Baltics?
Cayman Islands, at 26.14 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 41,648 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Cayman Islands and Central Europe and the Baltics?
26.10 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Cayman Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Central Europe and the Baltics?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Cayman Islands and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Cayman Islands ranks 2nd and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Cayman Islands vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.