Cape Verde vs Samoa: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Cape Verde
116,710 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
108,676 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
49th
Samoa rank
50th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Samoa
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k197720002023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 116,710 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 108,676 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 8,034 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 49th and Samoa ranks 50th of 197 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Samoa Difference Ahead
1970s 13,832 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,624 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,208 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1980s 17,341 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 14,392 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,949 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 32,187 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 20,113 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,075 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 88,414 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 42,029 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 46,384 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 85,620 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 63,795 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 21,825 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 111,306 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 97,935 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,371 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Cape Verde or Samoa?
Cape Verde, at 116,710 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 108,676 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Cape Verde and Samoa?
8,034 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Samoa?
43 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Samoa rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Cape Verde ranks 49th and Samoa ranks 50th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Samoa: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/samoa/">Cape Verde vs Samoa: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.