Brazil vs Madagascar: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
1,830 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar
1,675 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
168th
Madagascar rank
169th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Madagascar
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197419982023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 1,830 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,675 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Madagascar, a difference of 155 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Madagascar ahead.

Brazil ranks 168th and Madagascar ranks 169th of 197 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Madagascar Difference Ahead
1970s 12.97 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 150.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 137.16 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 23.73 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 243.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 219.95 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 256.24 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 264.17 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 442.5 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 520.59 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 78.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 611.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,317 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 705.46 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2020s 1,070 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,727 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 657.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Madagascar?
Brazil, at 1,830 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,675 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Madagascar?
155 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Madagascar?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Madagascar rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 168th and Madagascar ranks 169th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Madagascar: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/madagascar/">Brazil vs Madagascar: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.