Bolivia vs Canada: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Bolivia
1,415 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada
1,567 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
173rd
Canada rank
171st

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia
  • Canada
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 1,567 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,415 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Bolivia, a difference of 152 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Canada ahead.

Bolivia ranks 173rd and Canada ranks 171st of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Canada in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Canada Difference Ahead
1970s 27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 97.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 70.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Canada
1980s 85.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 190.34 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 105.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Canada
1990s 244.16 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 351.94 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 107.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Canada
2000s 729.98 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 735.54 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5.56 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Canada
2010s 1,308 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,074 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 233.69 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2020s 1,338 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,393 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 54.57 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Bolivia or Canada?
Canada, at 1,567 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,415 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Bolivia as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Bolivia and Canada?
152 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Canada?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Canada rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bolivia ranks 173rd and Canada ranks 171st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Canada: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/canada/">Bolivia vs Canada: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.