Antigua and Barbuda vs Barbados: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
119,675 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados
122,095 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Antigua and Barbuda rank
48th
Barbados rank
47th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Barbados
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196719952023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 122,095 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 119,675 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 2,420 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Barbados ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 48th and Barbados ranks 47th of 197 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Barbados Difference Ahead
1970s 14,773 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 72,883 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 58,111 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 28,976 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 122,679 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 93,702 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 51,357 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 201,963 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 150,606 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 82,192 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 403,875 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 321,683 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 88,362 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 340,356 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 251,994 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Barbados?
Barbados, at 122,095 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 119,675 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2017.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados?
2,420 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados?
41 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2017.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 48th and Barbados ranks 47th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Barbados: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/barbados/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/barbados/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Barbados: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.