Mexico vs Tanzania: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per

Mexico
588.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
606.47 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
155th
Tanzania rank
153rd

Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Mexico
  • Tanzania
0200400600197619992023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 606.47 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 588.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 17.55 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Tanzania ahead.

Mexico ranks 155th and Tanzania ranks 153rd of 196 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 3.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 27.48 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 24.39 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 6.34 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 23.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 16.73 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 14.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 60.72 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 46.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 33.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 75.73 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 42.59 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 305.24 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 79.15 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 226.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 469.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 223.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 245.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per, Mexico or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 606.47 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 588.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per between Mexico and Tanzania?
17.55 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Tanzania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Tanzania rank globally for secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per?
Mexico ranks 155th and Tanzania ranks 153rd of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Tanzania: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-other-sectors-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-other-sectors-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/tanzania/">Mexico vs Tanzania: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 8,276 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.