Malawi vs Uruguay: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per

Malawi
1,319 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
1,528 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
136th
Uruguay rank
135th

Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Malawi
  • Uruguay
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197720002023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 1,528 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,319 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 209 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 136th and Uruguay ranks 135th of 196 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Uruguay Difference Ahead
1970s 160.01 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.43 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 158.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 184.62 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 181.48 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 85.79 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 59.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 26.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 80.06 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 49.51 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 30.55 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 126.11 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 688.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 561.99 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 1,332 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,250 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 82.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per, Malawi or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 1,528 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,319 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per between Malawi and Uruguay?
209 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uruguay?
30 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Uruguay rank globally for secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per?
Malawi ranks 136th and Uruguay ranks 135th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Uruguay: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-other-sectors-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-other-sectors-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/uruguay/">Malawi vs Uruguay: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 8,276 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.