Congo vs Zimbabwe: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per

Congo
112.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zimbabwe
68.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
184th
Zimbabwe rank
187th

Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Congo
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k197720002023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 112.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 68.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 43.69 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.6 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 184th and Zimbabwe ranks 187th of 196 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 86.77 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 86.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0.6268 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 170.01 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 296.43 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 126.42 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 179.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 176.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.79 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 177.22 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 15.44 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 161.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 371.97 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 27.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 344.22 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 96.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 63.49 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 33.42 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per, Congo or Zimbabwe?
Congo, at 112.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 68.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
What is the difference in secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per between Congo and Zimbabwe?
43.69 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
28 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2021.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per?
Congo ranks 184th and Zimbabwe ranks 187th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zimbabwe: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-other-sectors-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-other-sectors-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo vs Zimbabwe: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 8,276 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.