Brazil vs Malawi: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per

Brazil
1,242 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
1,319 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
139th
Malawi rank
136th

Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Brazil
  • Malawi
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197519992023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 1,319 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,242 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 77 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Malawi ahead.

Brazil ranks 139th and Malawi ranks 136th of 196 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 9.57 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 108.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 99.06 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 7.51 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 213.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 206.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 16.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 234.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 218.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 56.99 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 80.06 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 23.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 263.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 126.11 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 136.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 528.57 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,332 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 803.37 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per, Brazil or Malawi?
Malawi, at 1,319 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,242 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per between Brazil and Malawi?
77 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Malawi?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Malawi rank globally for secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per?
Brazil ranks 139th and Malawi ranks 136th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Malawi: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-other-sectors-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-other-sectors-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/malawi/">Brazil vs Malawi: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 8,276 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.