Nepal vs Rwanda: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps
Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps over time
- Nepal
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 59.92 million BoP, current US$ against 54.85 million BoP, current US$ in Nepal, a difference of 5.07 million BoP, current US$.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 164th and Rwanda ranks 162nd of 198 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52.00 million BoP, current US$ | 58.61 million BoP, current US$ | 6.62 million BoP, current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 56.76 million BoP, current US$ | 49.59 million BoP, current US$ | 7.18 million BoP, current US$ | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), gaps, Nepal or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 59.92 million BoP, current US$ against 54.85 million BoP, current US$ in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), gaps between Nepal and Rwanda?
- 5.07 million BoP, current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Rwanda?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Rwanda rank globally for secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), gaps?
- Nepal ranks 164th and Rwanda ranks 162nd of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$) with 62 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.