Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
9.65 billion BoP, current US$
in 2024
Hong Kong
4.98 billion BoP, current US$
in 2024
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
36th
Hong Kong rank
35th

Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Hong Kong
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B197920012024

How they compare

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) currently reports 9.65 billion BoP, current US$ against 4.98 billion BoP, current US$ in Hong Kong, a difference of 4.67 billion BoP, current US$.

That makes Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s figure about 1.9 times Hong Kong's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 36th and Hong Kong ranks 35th of 47 groups.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Hong Kong Difference Ahead
2000s 5.05 billion BoP, current US$ 2.45 billion BoP, current US$ 2.59 billion BoP, current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2010s 6.96 billion BoP, current US$ 3.60 billion BoP, current US$ 3.36 billion BoP, current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2020s 8.73 billion BoP, current US$ 4.22 billion BoP, current US$ 4.51 billion BoP, current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), gaps, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Hong Kong?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), at 9.65 billion BoP, current US$ against 4.98 billion BoP, current US$ in Hong Kong as of 2024.
What is the difference in secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), gaps between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong?
4.67 billion BoP, current US$, with Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong rank globally for secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), gaps?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 36th and Hong Kong ranks 35th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-other-sectors-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-other-sectors-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/hong-kong-sar-china/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 8,738 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$) with 62 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.