Chile vs South Africa: SDRs holdings, US dollar, per square kilometre

Chile
4,541 units per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
4,863 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
92nd
South Africa rank
89th

SDRs holdings, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • South Africa
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 4,863 units per square kilometre against 4,541 units per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 322 units per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Chile ranks 92nd and South Africa ranks 89th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre —
1970s 38.42 units per square kilometre 29.92 units per square kilometre 8.49 units per square kilometre Chile
1980s 22.77 units per square kilometre 26.94 units per square kilometre 4.17 units per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 5.02 units per square kilometre 41.69 units per square kilometre 36.66 units per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 208.73 units per square kilometre 470.1 units per square kilometre 261.37 units per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 1,335 units per square kilometre 2,007 units per square kilometre 672.14 units per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 3,604 units per square kilometre 4,149 units per square kilometre 545.38 units per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdrs holdings, us dollar, per square kilometre, Chile or South Africa?
South Africa, at 4,863 units per square kilometre against 4,541 units per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in sdrs holdings, us dollar, per square kilometre between Chile and South Africa?
322 units per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and South Africa rank globally for sdrs holdings, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 92nd and South Africa ranks 89th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as SDRs holdings, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs South Africa: SDRs holdings, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/sdrs-holdings-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/chile/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/sdrs-holdings-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/chile/south-africa/">Chile vs South Africa: SDRs holdings, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDRs holdings, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

SDRs holdings, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.