Botswana vs Democratic Republic of Congo: SDRs holdings, US dollar, per square kilometre

Botswana
593.97 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo
386 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
141st
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
144th

SDRs holdings, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 593.97 units per square kilometre against 386 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 207.97 units per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.5 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Botswana ranks 141st and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 144th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Democratic Republic of Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre —
1970s 3.19 units per square kilometre 5.19 units per square kilometre 2 units per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
1980s 22.78 units per square kilometre 1.23 units per square kilometre 21.55 units per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 65.8 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 65.8 units per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 105.84 units per square kilometre 28.46 units per square kilometre 77.37 units per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 195.68 units per square kilometre 155.04 units per square kilometre 40.64 units per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 485.6 units per square kilometre 362.83 units per square kilometre 122.77 units per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdrs holdings, us dollar, per square kilometre, Botswana or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Botswana, at 593.97 units per square kilometre against 386 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in sdrs holdings, us dollar, per square kilometre between Botswana and Democratic Republic of Congo?
207.97 units per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Democratic Republic of Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for sdrs holdings, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 141st and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 144th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as SDRs holdings, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Democratic Republic of Congo: SDRs holdings, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/sdrs-holdings-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/sdrs-holdings-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-dem-rep/">Botswana vs Democratic Republic of Congo: SDRs holdings, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDRs holdings, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

SDRs holdings, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.