Afghanistan vs Saint Lucia: SDRs holdings, Percent of SDR Allocation
Afghanistan
63.67
in 2025
Saint Lucia
57.1
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
117th
Saint Lucia rank
119th
SDRs holdings, Percent of SDR Allocation over time
- Afghanistan
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 63.67 against 57.1 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 6.57.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 117th and Saint Lucia ranks 119th of 192 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 45.67 | 5.27 | 40.4 | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 6.42 | 185.49 | 179.06 | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 8.51 | 194.52 | 186.01 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 59.16 | 83.1 | 23.93 | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 62.75 | 57.23 | 5.53 | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdrs holdings, percent of sdr allocation, Afghanistan or Saint Lucia?
- Afghanistan, at 63.67 against 57.1 in Saint Lucia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in sdrs holdings, percent of sdr allocation between Afghanistan and Saint Lucia?
- 6.57, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Saint Lucia?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Afghanistan and Saint Lucia rank globally for sdrs holdings, percent of sdr allocation?
- Afghanistan ranks 117th and Saint Lucia ranks 119th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as SDRs holdings, Percent of SDR Allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fund Accounts dataset provides information on IMF member countries' transactions with, and accounts with the Fund.