Democratic Republic of Congo vs Tanzania: SDR Allocation, US dollar, per square kilometre

Democratic Republic of Congo
906.99 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
866.05 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
166th
Tanzania rank
169th

SDR Allocation, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Tanzania
02004006008001.0k196119922023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 906.99 units per square kilometre against 866.05 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 40.94 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 166th and Tanzania ranks 169th of 189 countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre —
1970s 19.63 units per square kilometre 18.32 units per square kilometre 1.31 units per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
1980s 44.7 units per square kilometre 41.58 units per square kilometre 3.12 units per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
1990s 53.74 units per square kilometre 49.99 units per square kilometre 3.75 units per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 84.87 units per square kilometre 79.8 units per square kilometre 5.06 units per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 327.39 units per square kilometre 312.48 units per square kilometre 14.92 units per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 769.34 units per square kilometre 734.58 units per square kilometre 34.77 units per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdr allocation, us dollar, per square kilometre, Democratic Republic of Congo or Tanzania?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 906.99 units per square kilometre against 866.05 units per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in sdr allocation, us dollar, per square kilometre between Democratic Republic of Congo and Tanzania?
40.94 units per square kilometre, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Tanzania rank globally for sdr allocation, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 166th and Tanzania ranks 169th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as SDR Allocation, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Tanzania: SDR Allocation, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/sdr-allocation-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/sdr-allocation-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/tanzania/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Tanzania: SDR Allocation, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDR Allocation, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

SDR Allocation, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.