Iceland vs Mauritania: Revenue from corporate income taxes as a share of GDP
Iceland
2.7%
in 2017
Mauritania
2.7%
in 2005
Iceland rank
75th
Mauritania rank
77th
Revenue from corporate income taxes as a share of GDP over time
- Iceland
- Mauritania
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2.7% against 2.7% in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 75th and Mauritania ranks 77th of 163 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9% | 1.9% | 1.0% | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 1.2% | 1.9% | 0.7% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher revenue from corporate income taxes as a share of gdp, Iceland or Mauritania?
- Iceland, at 2.7% against 2.7% in Mauritania as of 2017.
- What is the difference in revenue from corporate income taxes as a share of gdp between Iceland and Mauritania?
- 0.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
- How do Iceland and Mauritania rank globally for revenue from corporate income taxes as a share of gdp?
- Iceland ranks 75th and Mauritania ranks 77th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Centre for Tax and Development and UNU-WIDER (2019) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Revenue from corporate income taxes as a share of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Corporate income taxes include natural resources taxes.