Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Revenue, excluding grants
Sudan
8.8%
in 2016
Zimbabwe
8.1%
in 2018
Sudan rank
153rd
Zimbabwe rank
154th
Revenue, excluding grants over time
- Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 8.8% against 8.1% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 153rd and Zimbabwe ranks 154th of 157 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.3% | 9.8% | 4.6% | Sudan |
| 2010s | 10.2% | 19.3% | 9.1% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher revenue, excluding grants, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Sudan, at 8.8% against 8.1% in Zimbabwe as of 2016.
- What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 0.7%, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for revenue, excluding grants?
- Sudan ranks 153rd and Zimbabwe ranks 154th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Revenue, excluding grants (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Revenue is an increase in net worth resulting from a transaction. Grants are excluded from this figure. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.