Libya vs Taiwan Province of China: Reported Social Unrest Index
Reported Social Unrest Index over time
- Libya
- Taiwan Province of China
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 against 0 in Taiwan Province of China, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Taiwan Province of China ahead.
Libya ranks 75th and Taiwan Province of China ranks 75th of 133 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Taiwan Province of China in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Taiwan Province of China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43.37 | 80.48 | 37.11 | Taiwan Province of China |
| 2000s | 43.19 | 129.02 | 85.83 | Taiwan Province of China |
| 2010s | 155.23 | 87.57 | 67.66 | Libya |
| 2020s | 13.96 | 97.56 | 83.6 | Taiwan Province of China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported social unrest index, Libya or Taiwan Province of China?
- Libya, at 0 against 0 in Taiwan Province of China as of 2026.
- What is the difference in reported social unrest index between Libya and Taiwan Province of China?
- 0, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Taiwan Province of China?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Libya and Taiwan Province of China rank globally for reported social unrest index?
- Libya ranks 75th and Taiwan Province of China ranks 75th of 133 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Reported Social Unrest Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides two measures of social unrest derived from media reports. One is the “A” index from the paper, and the “events” series. Suggested citation: "Barrett, P., Appendino, M., Nguyen, K., & de Leon Miranda, J. (2022). Measuring social unrest using media reports. Journal of Development Economics, 158, 102924." Note: some sources mis-label China and Hong Kong SAR. Series which explicitly adjust for this are available on request from the authors.