Malta vs Sweden: Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for)

Malta
97,720 US dollars per worker, PPP converted
in 2024
Sweden
104,705 US dollars per worker, PPP converted
in 2024
Malta rank
15th
Sweden rank
12th

Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for) over time

  • Malta
  • Sweden
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k200020122024

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 104,705 US dollars per worker, PPP converted against 97,720 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in Malta, a difference of 6,985 US dollars per worker, PPP converted.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 12th of 41 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 70,404 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 90,359 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 19,956 US dollars per worker, PPP converted Sweden
2010s 85,338 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 100,084 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 14,746 US dollars per worker, PPP converted Sweden
2020s 94,984 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 104,201 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 9,217 US dollars per worker, PPP converted Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for), Malta or Sweden?
Sweden, at 104,705 US dollars per worker, PPP converted against 97,720 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in Malta as of 2024.
What is the difference in real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for) between Malta and Sweden?
6,985 US dollars per worker, PPP converted, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sweden?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Malta and Sweden rank globally for real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for)?
Malta ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 12th of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for inflation) - Regions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sweden: Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for). Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/real-labour-productivity-by-main-economic-activity-ropi-adjusted-for-inflation-regions/malta/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/real-labour-productivity-by-main-economic-activity-ropi-adjusted-for-inflation-regions/malta/sweden/">Malta vs Sweden: Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for inflation) - Regions
Unit
US dollars per worker, PPP converted
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
45 places, 1,131 data points, 1981–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides indicators on labour productivity for large and small regions. Real values are deflation-adjusted using the Regional Producer Price Index (ROPI), where available. Data source and definition Labour productivity is measured as gross value added per employment at place of work by main economic activity. Regional gross value added and employment data are collected from Eurostat (reg_eco10) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. In order to allow comparability over time and across countries, data in current prices are transformed into constant prices and PPP measures. Definition of regions Regions are subnational units below national boundaries. OECD countries have two regional levels: large regions (territorial level 2 or TL2) and small regions (territorial level 3 or TL3). For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf) and the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx). Use of economic data on small regions When economic analyses are carried out at the TL3 level, it is advisable to aggregate data at the metropolitan region level when several TL3 regions are associated to the same metropolitan region. Metropolitan regions combine TL3 regions when 50% or more of the regional population live in a functionnal urban areas above 250 000 inhabitants. This approach corrects the distortions created by commuting. Correspondence between TL3 and metropolitan regions:(xlsx). Small regions (TL3) are categorized based on shared characteristics into regional typologies. See the economic indicators aggregated by territorial typology at country level on the access to City typology (link) and by urban-rural typology (link). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats. Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.