Korea vs Luxembourg: Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for)

Korea
89,414 US dollars per worker, PPP converted
in 2024
Luxembourg
143,025 US dollars per worker, PPP converted
in 2024
Korea rank
1st
Luxembourg rank
2nd

Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for) over time

  • Korea
  • Luxembourg
50.0k100.0k150.0k199520092024

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 143,025 US dollars per worker, PPP converted against 89,414 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in Korea, a difference of 53,611 US dollars per worker, PPP converted.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.6 times Korea's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Korea ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 2 groups.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1990s 46,986 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 157,821 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 110,835 US dollars per worker, PPP converted Luxembourg
2000s 60,238 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 161,807 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 101,569 US dollars per worker, PPP converted Luxembourg
2010s 77,879 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 155,775 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 77,896 US dollars per worker, PPP converted Luxembourg
2020s 86,977 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 147,502 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 60,525 US dollars per worker, PPP converted Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for), Korea or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 143,025 US dollars per worker, PPP converted against 89,414 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for) between Korea and Luxembourg?
53,611 US dollars per worker, PPP converted, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Luxembourg?
27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
How do Korea and Luxembourg rank globally for real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for)?
Korea ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for inflation) - Regions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Luxembourg: Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for). Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/real-labour-productivity-by-main-economic-activity-ropi-adjusted-for-inflation-regions/korea/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/real-labour-productivity-by-main-economic-activity-ropi-adjusted-for-inflation-regions/korea/luxembourg/">Korea vs Luxembourg: Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for inflation) - Regions
Unit
US dollars per worker, PPP converted
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
45 places, 1,131 data points, 1981–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides indicators on labour productivity for large and small regions. Real values are deflation-adjusted using the Regional Producer Price Index (ROPI), where available. Data source and definition Labour productivity is measured as gross value added per employment at place of work by main economic activity. Regional gross value added and employment data are collected from Eurostat (reg_eco10) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. In order to allow comparability over time and across countries, data in current prices are transformed into constant prices and PPP measures. Definition of regions Regions are subnational units below national boundaries. OECD countries have two regional levels: large regions (territorial level 2 or TL2) and small regions (territorial level 3 or TL3). For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf) and the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx). Use of economic data on small regions When economic analyses are carried out at the TL3 level, it is advisable to aggregate data at the metropolitan region level when several TL3 regions are associated to the same metropolitan region. Metropolitan regions combine TL3 regions when 50% or more of the regional population live in a functionnal urban areas above 250 000 inhabitants. This approach corrects the distortions created by commuting. Correspondence between TL3 and metropolitan regions:(xlsx). Small regions (TL3) are categorized based on shared characteristics into regional typologies. See the economic indicators aggregated by territorial typology at country level on the access to City typology (link) and by urban-rural typology (link). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats. Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.