Cyprus vs Japan: Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for)
Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for) over time
- Cyprus
- Japan
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 88,438 US dollars per worker, PPP converted against 88,414 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in Japan, a difference of 24 US dollars per worker, PPP converted.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 21st and Japan ranks 22nd of 41 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 76,296 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 86,168 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 9,873 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | Japan |
| 2020s | 81,894 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 84,638 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 2,744 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for), Cyprus or Japan?
- Cyprus, at 88,438 US dollars per worker, PPP converted against 88,414 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for) between Cyprus and Japan?
- 24 US dollars per worker, PPP converted, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Japan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Cyprus and Japan rank globally for real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for)?
- Cyprus ranks 21st and Japan ranks 22nd of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for inflation) - Regions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides indicators on labour productivity for large and small regions. Real values are deflation-adjusted using the Regional Producer Price Index (ROPI), where available. Data source and definition Labour productivity is measured as gross value added per employment at place of work by main economic activity. Regional gross value added and employment data are collected from Eurostat (reg_eco10) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. In order to allow comparability over time and across countries, data in current prices are transformed into constant prices and PPP measures. Definition of regions Regions are subnational units below national boundaries. OECD countries have two regional levels: large regions (territorial level 2 or TL2) and small regions (territorial level 3 or TL3). For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf) and the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx). Use of economic data on small regions When economic analyses are carried out at the TL3 level, it is advisable to aggregate data at the metropolitan region level when several TL3 regions are associated to the same metropolitan region. Metropolitan regions combine TL3 regions when 50% or more of the regional population live in a functionnal urban areas above 250 000 inhabitants. This approach corrects the distortions created by commuting. Correspondence between TL3 and metropolitan regions:(xlsx). Small regions (TL3) are categorized based on shared characteristics into regional typologies. See the economic indicators aggregated by territorial typology at country level on the access to City typology (link) and by urban-rural typology (link). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats. Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.