New Zealand vs Poland: Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for)

New Zealand
81,292 US dollars per worker, PPP converted
in 2023
Poland
81,696 US dollars per worker, PPP converted
in 2024
New Zealand rank
25th
Poland rank
24th

Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for) over time

  • New Zealand
  • Poland
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199920112024

How they compare

Poland currently reports 81,696 US dollars per worker, PPP converted against 81,292 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in New Zealand, a difference of 404 US dollars per worker, PPP converted.

Across all 24 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 25th and Poland ranks 24th of 41 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 73,817 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 49,779 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 24,038 US dollars per worker, PPP converted New Zealand
2010s 79,392 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 65,630 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 13,762 US dollars per worker, PPP converted New Zealand
2020s 81,147 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 76,786 US dollars per worker, PPP converted 4,361 US dollars per worker, PPP converted New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for), New Zealand or Poland?
Poland, at 81,696 US dollars per worker, PPP converted against 81,292 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for) between New Zealand and Poland?
404 US dollars per worker, PPP converted, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Poland?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Poland rank globally for real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for)?
New Zealand ranks 25th and Poland ranks 24th of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for inflation) - Regions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Poland: Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for). Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/real-labour-productivity-by-main-economic-activity-ropi-adjusted-for-inflation-regions-2/new-zealand/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/real-labour-productivity-by-main-economic-activity-ropi-adjusted-for-inflation-regions-2/new-zealand/poland/">New Zealand vs Poland: Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for inflation) - Regions
Unit
US dollars per worker, PPP converted
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
45 places, 1,131 data points, 1981–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides indicators on labour productivity for large and small regions. Real values are deflation-adjusted using the Regional Producer Price Index (ROPI), where available. Data source and definition Labour productivity is measured as gross value added per employment at place of work by main economic activity. Regional gross value added and employment data are collected from Eurostat (reg_eco10) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. In order to allow comparability over time and across countries, data in current prices are transformed into constant prices and PPP measures. Definition of regions Regions are subnational units below national boundaries. OECD countries have two regional levels: large regions (territorial level 2 or TL2) and small regions (territorial level 3 or TL3). For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf) and the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx). Use of economic data on small regions When economic analyses are carried out at the TL3 level, it is advisable to aggregate data at the metropolitan region level when several TL3 regions are associated to the same metropolitan region. Metropolitan regions combine TL3 regions when 50% or more of the regional population live in a functionnal urban areas above 250 000 inhabitants. This approach corrects the distortions created by commuting. Correspondence between TL3 and metropolitan regions:(xlsx). Small regions (TL3) are categorized based on shared characteristics into regional typologies. See the economic indicators aggregated by territorial typology at country level on the access to City typology (link) and by urban-rural typology (link). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats. Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.