Singapore vs Uruguay: Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by

Singapore
121.75
in 2025
Uruguay
127.87
in 2025
Singapore rank
14th
Uruguay rank
11th

Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by over time

  • Singapore
  • Uruguay
050100150197920022025

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 127.87 against 121.75 in Singapore, a difference of 6.12.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Uruguay ahead.

Singapore ranks 14th and Uruguay ranks 11th of 93 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Uruguay Difference Ahead
1980s 97.51 85.84 11.68 Singapore
1990s 101.19 93.77 7.42 Singapore
2000s 94.78 88.66 6.12 Singapore
2010s 107.53 108.78 1.24 Uruguay
2020s 112.82 119.61 6.79 Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher real effective exchange rate (reer), index (2010=100) adjusted by, Singapore or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 127.87 against 121.75 in Singapore as of 2025.
What is the difference in real effective exchange rate (reer), index (2010=100) adjusted by between Singapore and Uruguay?
6.12, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Uruguay?
46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
How do Singapore and Uruguay rank globally for real effective exchange rate (reer), index (2010=100) adjusted by?
Singapore ranks 14th and Uruguay ranks 11th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by relative consumer prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Uruguay: Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/real-effective-exchange-rate-reer-index-2010-100-adjusted-by-relative-consumer-prices/singapore/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/real-effective-exchange-rate-reer-index-2010-100-adjusted-by-relative-consumer-prices/singapore/uruguay/">Singapore vs Uruguay: Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by relative consumer prices
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
94 places, 4,132 data points, 1979–2025
Last refreshed

The Effective Exchange Rate (EER) dataset includes annual, quarterly and monthly nominal and real effective exchange rates by economy. Nominal effective exchange rates (NEERs) measure the value of a country's currency in relation to a weighted average of the currency values of their major trading partners. Real effective exchange rates (REERs) adjust the NEER to account for a country's inflation rate in relation to the weighted inflation rate of their major trading partners. The IMF publishes NEERs and REERs for approximately 90 IMF member countries that account for the vast share of global international trade. These statistics help policymakers and analysts assess the competitiveness of a country's exports, monitor currency trends, evaluate the impact of exchange rate changes on trade flows, and inform decisions regarding monetary policy, exchange rate management, and international trade. The EERs are calculated by IMF staff using exchange rate information, consumer price indexes received from national authorities and international trade weights. These weights are calculated as three-year averages of annual data available from official sources on trade, tourism and manufacturing collected from the United Nations (UN), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), World Bank, World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).