Equatorial Guinea vs Malawi: Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by

Equatorial Guinea
104.5
in 2025
Malawi
103.51
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
45th
Malawi rank
47th

Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Malawi
50100150200198020022025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 104.5 against 103.51 in Malawi, a difference of 0.99.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Malawi ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 45th and Malawi ranks 47th of 93 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Malawi Difference Ahead
1980s 99.06 183.86 84.8 Malawi
1990s 70.66 159.66 89 Malawi
2000s 83.87 114.47 30.61 Malawi
2010s 102 80.12 21.88 Equatorial Guinea
2020s 103.16 94.43 8.73 Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher real effective exchange rate (reer), index (2010=100) adjusted by, Equatorial Guinea or Malawi?
Equatorial Guinea, at 104.5 against 103.51 in Malawi as of 2025.
What is the difference in real effective exchange rate (reer), index (2010=100) adjusted by between Equatorial Guinea and Malawi?
0.99, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Malawi?
41 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Malawi rank globally for real effective exchange rate (reer), index (2010=100) adjusted by?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 45th and Malawi ranks 47th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by relative consumer prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Malawi: Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/real-effective-exchange-rate-reer-index-2010-100-adjusted-by-relative-consumer-prices/equatorial-guinea/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/real-effective-exchange-rate-reer-index-2010-100-adjusted-by-relative-consumer-prices/equatorial-guinea/malawi/">Equatorial Guinea vs Malawi: Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Real effective exchange rate (REER), Index (2010=100) Adjusted by relative consumer prices
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
94 places, 4,132 data points, 1979–2025
Last refreshed

The Effective Exchange Rate (EER) dataset includes annual, quarterly and monthly nominal and real effective exchange rates by economy. Nominal effective exchange rates (NEERs) measure the value of a country's currency in relation to a weighted average of the currency values of their major trading partners. Real effective exchange rates (REERs) adjust the NEER to account for a country's inflation rate in relation to the weighted inflation rate of their major trading partners. The IMF publishes NEERs and REERs for approximately 90 IMF member countries that account for the vast share of global international trade. These statistics help policymakers and analysts assess the competitiveness of a country's exports, monitor currency trends, evaluate the impact of exchange rate changes on trade flows, and inform decisions regarding monetary policy, exchange rate management, and international trade. The EERs are calculated by IMF staff using exchange rate information, consumer price indexes received from national authorities and international trade weights. These weights are calculated as three-year averages of annual data available from official sources on trade, tourism and manufacturing collected from the United Nations (UN), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), World Bank, World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).