Equatorial Guinea vs Zambia: Real effective exchange rate index

Equatorial Guinea
127.39 line rec, 2005 = 100
in 2011
Zambia
122.67 line rec, 2005 = 100
in 2011
Equatorial Guinea rank
2nd
Zambia rank
3rd

Real effective exchange rate index over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Zambia
50100150200250198019952011

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 127.39 line rec, 2005 = 100 against 122.67 line rec, 2005 = 100 in Zambia, a difference of 4.72 line rec, 2005 = 100.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 2nd and Zambia ranks 3rd of 20 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Zambia Difference Ahead
1980s 113.85 line rec, 2005 = 100 60.27 line rec, 2005 = 100 53.57 line rec, 2005 = 100 Equatorial Guinea
1990s 80.97 line rec, 2005 = 100 68.92 line rec, 2005 = 100 12.05 line rec, 2005 = 100 Equatorial Guinea
2000s 94.84 line rec, 2005 = 100 102.28 line rec, 2005 = 100 7.44 line rec, 2005 = 100 Zambia
2010s 123.94 line rec, 2005 = 100 124.32 line rec, 2005 = 100 0.3795 line rec, 2005 = 100 Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher real effective exchange rate index, Equatorial Guinea or Zambia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 127.39 line rec, 2005 = 100 against 122.67 line rec, 2005 = 100 in Zambia as of 2011.
What is the difference in real effective exchange rate index between Equatorial Guinea and Zambia?
4.72 line rec, 2005 = 100, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Zambia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2011.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Zambia rank globally for real effective exchange rate index?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 2nd and Zambia ranks 3rd of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics, published as Real effective exchange rate index (line rec, 2005 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Zambia: Real effective exchange rate index. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/real-effective-exchange-rate-index-line-rec-2005-100/equatorial-guinea/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/real-effective-exchange-rate-index-line-rec-2005-100/equatorial-guinea/zambia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Zambia: Real effective exchange rate index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Real effective exchange rate index (line rec, 2005 = 100)
Unit
line rec, 2005 = 100
Source
International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 872 data points, 1975–2011
Last refreshed

Real effective exchange rate is the nominal effective exchange rate (a measure of the value of a currency against a weighted average of several foreign currencies) divided by a price deflator or index of costs. This indicator corresponds to the IFS's line rec, and is based on a nominal rate adjusted for relative changes in consumer prices.