Madagascar vs Namibia: Real agricultural GDP growth rates
Real agricultural GDP growth rates over time
- Madagascar
- Namibia
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 8.5% against 7.7% in Namibia, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Namibia ahead.
Madagascar ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 11th of 46 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2.2% | 1.3% | 0.8% | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 1.9% | 4.8% | 2.9% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 2.7% | -0.0% | 2.7% | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher real agricultural gdp growth rates, Madagascar or Namibia?
- Madagascar, at 8.5% against 7.7% in Namibia as of 2009.
- What is the difference in real agricultural gdp growth rates between Madagascar and Namibia?
- 0.8%, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Namibia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2009.
- How do Madagascar and Namibia rank globally for real agricultural gdp growth rates?
- Madagascar ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 11th of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank country economists, published as Real agricultural GDP growth rates (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This is the annual rate of growth of agricultural GDP. Value added in agriculture measures the output of the agricultural sector (ISIC divisions 1-5) less the value of intermediate inputs. Agriculture comprises value added from forestry, hunting, and fishing as well as cultivation of crops and livestock production. Value added is the net output of a sector after adding up all outputs and subtracting intermediate inputs. It is calculated without making deductions for depreciation of fabricated assets or depletion and degradation of natural resources. The industrial origin of value added is determined by the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC), revision 2. Data are in current local currency.