Egypt vs Eswatini: Real agricultural GDP growth rates
Real agricultural GDP growth rates over time
- Egypt
- Eswatini
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 2.7% against 2.6% in Eswatini, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 24 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 37th and Eswatini ranks 38th of 46 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 4 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.2% | -1.2% | 4.4% | Egypt |
| 1980s | 2.8% | 3.2% | 0.4% | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 3.0% | 0.7% | 2.3% | Egypt |
| 2000s | 3.4% | 0.4% | 2.9% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 3.1% | 2.9% | 0.1% | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher real agricultural gdp growth rates, Egypt or Eswatini?
- Egypt, at 2.7% against 2.6% in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in real agricultural gdp growth rates between Egypt and Eswatini?
- 0.1%, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Eswatini?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2011.
- How do Egypt and Eswatini rank globally for real agricultural gdp growth rates?
- Egypt ranks 37th and Eswatini ranks 38th of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank country economists, published as Real agricultural GDP growth rates (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This is the annual rate of growth of agricultural GDP. Value added in agriculture measures the output of the agricultural sector (ISIC divisions 1-5) less the value of intermediate inputs. Agriculture comprises value added from forestry, hunting, and fishing as well as cultivation of crops and livestock production. Value added is the net output of a sector after adding up all outputs and subtracting intermediate inputs. It is calculated without making deductions for depreciation of fabricated assets or depletion and degradation of natural resources. The industrial origin of value added is determined by the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC), revision 2. Data are in current local currency.